<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Personal Development by Richard X. Thripp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardxthripp.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardxthripp.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Being a Free Photographer by davidscubadiver</title>
		<link>http://richardxthripp.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/being-a-free-photographer/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>davidscubadiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardxthripp.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Nicely said. I am mostly interested in underwater photography (you can check them out on my blog), which can be a bit more challenging than land-based photography (if only because I&#039;m wearing a dive mask, my subjects are frequently in motion (and not infrequently, trying to get away) and because the water robs the pictures of color).  

There is a debate in &quot;nature&quot; photography concerning the ethics of manipulating the wildlife. Is it &quot;ok&quot; to disturb this animal to get the shot? An Octopus never swims in the middle of the water column, but if someone picks it up and &quot;drops&quot; it from above, I can get a great shot with the sun&#039;s rays lancing through the spread out arms....

Personally, I never touch an animal and do my best to take only a few pictures of any one creature, particularly if I am using a flash. I figure I&#039;m a guest in their world, and I&#039;m not a professional so I don&#039;t need to get the &quot;killer shot&quot; to put food on my table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely said. I am mostly interested in underwater photography (you can check them out on my blog), which can be a bit more challenging than land-based photography (if only because I&#8217;m wearing a dive mask, my subjects are frequently in motion (and not infrequently, trying to get away) and because the water robs the pictures of color).  </p>
<p>There is a debate in &#8220;nature&#8221; photography concerning the ethics of manipulating the wildlife. Is it &#8220;ok&#8221; to disturb this animal to get the shot? An Octopus never swims in the middle of the water column, but if someone picks it up and &#8220;drops&#8221; it from above, I can get a great shot with the sun&#8217;s rays lancing through the spread out arms&#8230;.</p>
<p>Personally, I never touch an animal and do my best to take only a few pictures of any one creature, particularly if I am using a flash. I figure I&#8217;m a guest in their world, and I&#8217;m not a professional so I don&#8217;t need to get the &#8220;killer shot&#8221; to put food on my table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
